Introduction
The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) is a landmark legislation in India that empowers citizens to seek information from public authorities, thereby promoting transparency, accountability, and good governance. It provides a mechanism for citizens to access government records and ensures public participation in democracy.
The Act is based on the principle that information is the cornerstone of democracy, enabling people to hold government institutions accountable for their actions. It repealed the Freedom of Information Act, 2002, and established a strong legal framework for ensuring the right to information under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and expression.
Full Text of the RTI Act, 2005
Objectives of the RTI Act
- To promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities.
- To empower citizens by providing them access to government information.
- To reduce corruption and misuse of power by making the government more accountable.
- To ensure efficient governance by compelling public authorities to provide timely and accurate information.
- To strengthen democracy by ensuring informed decision-making by citizens.
Scope & Coverage of the RTI Act
The RTI Act applies to:
✅ Central, State, and Local Governments
✅ Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)
✅ Government-funded NGOs and institutions
✅ Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary (except for sensitive information)
❌ Exempted Bodies: Intelligence and security agencies such as the RAW, IB, CBI, NIA, and other organizations specified under the Second Schedule of the Act.
Key Provisions of the RTI Act, 2005
1. Right to Seek Information (Section 3-6)
Every Indian citizen has the right to:
- Request any information held by public authorities.
- Inspect government documents, records, and official files.
- Take certified copies of public documents.
- Obtain samples of materials used in public works (e.g., road construction materials).
2. Public Information Officers (PIOs) (Section 5-6)
- Every public authority must appoint Public Information Officers (PIOs) to handle RTI requests.
- PIOs must provide the requested information within 30 days.
- In case of life or liberty-related matters, information must be provided within 48 hours.
3. Exemptions from Disclosure (Section 8-9)
Certain information is exempt from disclosure, including:
- National security and sovereignty-related matters.
- Information that may endanger a person’s life or safety.
- Trade secrets and intellectual property.
- Cabinet papers before a decision is made.
- Personal information without public interest.
4. Appeals & Penalties (Section 19-20)
- If a request is denied, the applicant can appeal to a First Appellate Authority within 30 days.
- A second appeal can be filed with the State or Central Information Commission.
- PIOs failing to provide information without a valid reason can be fined ₹250 per day (up to ₹25,000).
5. Role of Information Commissions (Section 12-14, 23-24)
- The Central Information Commission (CIC) handles appeals for Central Government departments.
- The State Information Commission (SIC) handles appeals for State Government departments.
- These commissions have the power to investigate complaints, summon officials, and impose penalties.
Landmark RTI Case Laws
1. CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011)
- Issue: Whether students have the right to access their evaluated answer sheets under RTI.
- Judgment: Supreme Court held that students can obtain copies of their answer sheets, as they are public documents under the RTI Act.
2. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) v. Jayantilal Mistry (2015)
- Issue: RBI refused to disclose information related to banking frauds.
- Judgment: Supreme Court directed RBI to provide details of defaulters and loan write-offs, reinforcing transparency in banking.
3. Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. Office of the CJI (2019)
- Issue: Whether the Office of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) is covered under RTI.
- Judgment: Supreme Court ruled that the CJI’s office is a public authority under RTI, ensuring judicial transparency.
4. Raj Narain v. Indira Gandhi (1975)
- Issue: Whether citizens have the right to information on government decisions.
- Judgment: Supreme Court held that the right to know is derived from the right to freedom of speech and expression (Article 19(1)(a)).
Comparison: RTI vs. Whistleblower Protection Act
| Feature | RTI Act, 2005 | Whistleblower Protection Act, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Access to public information | Protection for individuals reporting corruption |
| Who Can Apply? | Any Indian citizen | Employees, officers, and individuals reporting misconduct |
| Confidentiality | Applicant’s details are not protected | Whistleblower’s identity is protected |
| Information | Public records and documents | Corruption, fraud, and misuse of power |
| Penalty for Non-Compliance | Fine on PIOs (₹250/day) | Protection from threats and retaliation |
Challenges in RTI Implementation
- Delays in Response: Many government officials delay or deny responses to RTI requests.
- Threats to RTI Activists: Several activists have faced threats, assaults, and even murders for exposing corruption.
- Lack of Awareness: Many citizens do not know about their rights under RTI.
- Exemptions & Misuse: Some government agencies wrongly cite exemptions to deny information.
- Poor Record-Keeping: Many public authorities do not maintain proper records, making it difficult to retrieve information.
Recent Developments & Reforms
- Amendment to RTI Act (2019): Reduced the autonomy of Information Commissions by allowing the government to determine their tenure and salaries.
- Digitization of RTI: The government launched RTI Online Portal to file RTI applications digitally.
- Judicial Directives: Courts have directed authorities to reduce delays in responding to RTI applications.
Conclusion
The RTI Act, 2005 is a powerful tool for transparency, good governance, and citizen empowerment. However, challenges such as delays, intimidation of activists, and bureaucratic resistance continue to hinder its effectiveness. Strengthening the implementation, reducing exemptions, and providing better protection for applicants can make RTI a more effective law.
Way Forward:
- Strict penalties for delays in providing information.
- Stronger protection for RTI activists to prevent attacks and threats.
- Better awareness campaigns to educate citizens about RTI.
- More digitization and proactive disclosure by public authorities.
Latest Moot court Competition
